FILE: <bc-19.htm>             `                                                                                                                                   Pooled References  
                           GENERAL INDEX           [Navigate
to   MAIN MENU ]
 
 
     FACULTATIVE
SEX REGULATION
                     In Arthropods
                                                (Contacts)
 
---- Please CLICK on underlined categories for detail[ to search for Subject Matter, depress
Ctrl/F ]:
 
Spermatheca
and Spermathecal Gland
Types of
Spermathecae in Hymenoptera
References     [Please
refer also to Selected Reviews  &  Detailed Research ]
| History           Biparental
  Hymenoptera are well known for their ability to regulate the sex ratio of
  their offspring, which is
  dependent on their haplo-diploid kind of reproduction. In the process, the
  ovipositing female responds by instinct to environmental stimuli. Stimuli
  such as host density, host size, temperature, humidity, parasitoid density,
  etc., interact on the instincts of the female to cause her to lay fertilized
  or unfertilized eggs. However, the female's physiological condition can
  affect the way she responds to various stimuli. When such factors as lack of
  mating, female age and nutrition, infection with certain microorganisms,
  genetic phenomena, etc. are involved and sex regulation is not possible. Spermatheca
  and Spermathecal Gland           The spermatheca and spermathecal gland
  are organs that enable sex regulation to take place. Sperm stored in the
  hymenopteran spermatheca are quiescent except when the females are in contact
  with oviposition sites which stimulates the spermathecal gland (Flanders
  1939). Flanders demonstrated sperm quiescence in the wasp Tiphia, which had been
  suspected by Lillie (1919, p. 132). To account for this quiescence, Flanders
  accepted as valid the conclusions of Lillie (1919) and other contemporaries
  that sperm when in concentrated suspensions retain their vitality longer than
  in more dilute suspensions because they rapidly produce a paralyzing
  concentration of CO2. Lillie (1919) noted that insect sperm when
  stored in the spermatheca retain their vitality for many years.           The few
  sperms at the opening of the spermatheca must be subjected to some activating
  agent before the egg can be fertilized. The source of such an agent appears
  to be the spermathecal gland, which presumably secretes a fluid that is
  slightly alkaline (Flanders 1946). In the honeybee, Lensky & Schindler
  (1967) found that the spermathecal gland fluid and contents of the
  spermatheca ranged from neutral to pH 9; and the activation of sperm was accomplished
  by dilution in pH 4.5 to 9.0. This refutes Lillie's hypothesis of CO2
  anesthetization.           The capacity
  of the spermathecal gland to keep pace with the rate of egg deposition is
  probably an important factor in determining the sex ratio (Flanders 1947).           Types of Spermathecae
  in Hymenoptera.--Many hypotheses antedated Flanders (1939) to explain the
  apparent ability of the mated arrhenotokous female to control the action of
  the spermatheca. Phillips (1903) made some remarks about facultative
  fertilization, and Schrader (1920) stated that the female fertilizes its eggs
  in response to a stimulus, while studying the white fly Trialeurodes vaporariorum
  (Westwood). Flanders believed that the spermathecal gland may be stimulated
  by contact of the antennae, legs, or ovipositor with the medium on which the
  eggs are to be deposited, with variations in the condition of this medium
  causing variable amounts of stimulation. It is probable that the spermatheca
  responds only to the stimuli of certain intensities, reacting to its fullest
  extent or not at all. In some biparental species the spermatheca, if
  functional, may be stimulated only by the passage of an egg. In such cases
  every deposited egg would be fertilized as long as the spermatheca contained viable
  sperm. It is interesting that in some females that reproduce by thelytoky,
  the spermatheca appears capable of functioning. Sometimes mating may even
  occur in such species [e.g., Encyrtus
  spp., Muscidifurax uniraptor Kogan & Legner, Aphytis mytilaspidis (LeBaron) (Legner 1988a, Rossler &
  DeBach 1972a)]. Significant behavioral and sex ratio changes accompany mating
  of thelytokous females, however (Legner 1988b). A peculiar
  situation is known to exist with some thelytokous Coleoptera [e.g., the
  white-fringed beetle, Graphognathus
  leucoloma (Boheman)] where
  copulation with a male of a different species is required before any of the
  thelytokous eggs can be viable.           Three types
  of spermathecae have been described in Hymenoptera (Flanders 1939, 1956). Type I is found in the honeybee, and Tiphia. There is a wide sperm duct which can be bent into
  a valve at its juncture with the capsule. A number of sperm can be discharged
  simultaneously, and glandular fluids activate and transport sperm, which
  serves to regulate the number of sperm released on each egg as it passes
  along the oviduct. The spermathecal gland empties into the sperm capsule
  instead of the sperm duct as in other species.          
  Type II spermatheca is
  found in ichneumonids and braconids. The spermathecal gland empties into the
  lumen of the sperm duct. The short exit passage from the capsule to the sperm
  duct is so narrow that only a single sperm can move in or out at one time.
  The gland is very voluminous in ichneumonids, while braconids have a smaller
  gland but it is accompanied by a contractile reservoir.          
  Type III spermatheca
  occurs in chalcidoids. The gland is very small, and glandular secretions
  serve only for sperm activation. The sperm in these species are
  extraordinarily long. Considerations
  in Sex Regulation           In females
  with activated sperm, the sequence of fertilized and unfertilized eggs may be
  determined in part by the rate of oviposition. The number of sperms present
  in the spermatheca can also influence sex ratio as well as previous
  oviposition experience. Marchal (1898) suggested that the power of
  discrimination on the part of the female is effected through the differential
  stimulation of the spermatheca, the latter being activated only when the
  female honeybee oviposits in large cells. Marchal also was the first to
  suggest that a spermatheca could become fatigued. Coccophagus ochraceus
  Howard parasitizing Saissetia
  spp. stands on top of the host when her spermathecal gland is turgid and
  injects a fertilized egg internally. When the gland is depleted she stands at
  the side of the host and deposits a male egg underneath the host in a dry
  environment.           In
  endoparasitic braconids of the genera Apanteles
  and Opius, the females are
  characterized by small uterine-stored eggs that can be deposited very
  rapidly. Since these females possess Bracon-type
  spermathecae, the spermathecal gland of gregarious species cannot keep pace
  with the egg deposition. The proportion of eggs that thus escape
  fertilization is so great in Apanteles
  and Opius (Biosteres) that males usually
  predominate even at low densities under field conditions. Spalangia species deposit more
  fertilized eggs when oviposition occurs at high than at low host densities
  (Legner 1967a,
  1967b), a trend that
  was also observed in Goniozus
  legneri Gordh (Legner &
  Warkentin 1988 ). However, the rate of oviposition here is not rapid in a way
  that some eggs might escape fertilization. External stimuli (namely variable host
  densities) are thought to influence the spermathecal gland directly. This
  response of fertilizing more eggs at high host densities was hypothesized by
  Flanders (1939) using evidence from field data, where sex ratios tend to
  favor females at increasing host field densities. Exercise 19.1--How do sperm stored in the spermatheca become
  activated? Exercise 19.2--Describe the various types of spermathecae in
  Hymenoptera. Exercise 19.3--How does rate of oviposition influence the sex ratio? Exercise 19.4--How does host density influence the sex ratio? Exercise 19.5--Explain how the progeny increase in response to host
  density with parasitoids of synanthropic flies, affects the functional and
  numerical responses in their populations. Exercise 19.6--Using examples of Spalangia
  cameroni, S. endius, Muscidifurax
  and Nasonia, discuss all the
  subtle responses of these species to fluctuating host densities. Explain how
  any or all of such responses might be measured in nature. REFERENCES:        [Additional references may be found at 
  MELVYL Library ] Bellows,
  T. S., Jr. & T. W. Fisher, (eds) 1999. Handbook of Biological Control:
  Principles and Applications. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.  1046 p. Flanders, S. E. 1939. Environmental
  control of sex in hymenopterous insects. Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 32: 11-26. Flanders, S. E. 1943. The
  role of mating in the reproduction of parasitic Hymenoptera. J. Econ. Ent. 36: 802-03. Flanders, S. E. 1946a. The
  mechanism of sex control of the honey bee. J. Econ. Ent. 39: 379. Flanders, S. E. 1946b. Control
  of sex and sex-limited polymorphism in the Hymenoptera. Quart. Rev. Biol. 21:
  135-43. Flanders, S. E. 1947. Elements
  of host discovery exemplified by parasitic Hymenoptera. Ecology 28: 299-309. Flanders,
  S. E. 1956. The mechanisms of sex ratio regulation in the parasitic
  Hymenoptera. Insectes Sociaux 3: 325-34. Flanders,
  S. E. 1969. Herbert D. Smith's observation on citrus blackfly parasites in
  India and Mexico and the correlated circumstances. Canad. Ent. 101: 467-80. 45.   Legner, E. F.  1967a.  Two exotic
  strains of Spalangia drosophilae merit consideration in
  biological control of Hippelates collusor (Diptera: Chloropidae).  Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 60(2):  458-462.   46.   Legner, E. F.  1967b.  Behavior changes
  the reproduction of Spalangia cameroni, S. endius, Muscidifurax raptor, and Nasonia  vitripennis  (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) at increasing
  fly host densities.  Ann. Entomol.
  Soc. Amer. 60(4):  819-826.   237.   Legner, E. F.  1988a.  Muscidifurax raptorellus (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) females exhibit
  postmating oviposition behavior typical of the male genome.  Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 81(3):  522-527.   241.   Legner, E. F.  1988.  Studies of four
  thelytokous Puerto Rican isolates of Muscidifurax
  uniraptorEntomophaga 33(3);  269-280.      240.   Legner, E. F. & R. W. Warkentin.  1988.  Parasitization of Goniozus legneri
  (Hymenoptera: Bethylidae) at increasing parasite and host Amyelois transitella (Lepidoptera: Phycitidae) densities.  Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 81(5):  774-776. Lensky, Y. & H. Schindler. 1967.
  Motility and reversible inactivation of honeybee spermatozoa in vivo and in
  vitro. Ann.
  del Abeille 10(1): 5-16. Lillie, F. R. 19l9. Problems
  of fertilization. Univ. of Chicago Sci. Series. 278 p. Marchal,
  P. 1898. Le cycle evolutif de l' Encyrtus
  fusicollis. Bull. Soc. Ent.
  de France: 109-11. Marchal,
  P. 1904. Recherches sur la biologie et le developpement des hymenopteres
  parasites. I.
  La Polyembryonie specifique ou germinogonie. Arch. de Zool. Exp. et Gen. 2:
  257-335. Marchal, P. 1936. Recherches sur la
  biologie et le developpement des Hymenopteres parasites: Les Trichogrammes. Ann.
  Epiphyties, Paris 2: 447-550. Phillips,
  E. F. 1903. A review of parthenogenesis. Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc. 42: 275-345. Rössler, Y. & P. DeBach. 1972a.
  The biosystematic relations between a thelytokous and an arrhenotokous form
  of Aphytis mytilaspidis (LeBaron)
  [Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae]. I. The reproductive relations. Entomophaga 17: 391-423. Rössler, Y. & P. DeBach. 1972b.
  The biosystematic relations between a thelytokous and an arrhenotokous form
  of Aphytis mytilaspidis (LeBaron)
  [Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae]. 2. Comparative biological and morphological
  studies. Entomophaga
  17: 425-35. Rössler, Y. & P. DeBach. 1973.
  Genetic variability in a thelytokous form of Aphytis mytilaspidis
  (LeBaron) [Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae]. Hilgardia 42(5): 149-76. Schrader, F. 1920. Sex
  determination in the white fly (Trialeurodes
  vaporariorum). J. Morph. 34:
  267-98.   |